Recently in Child Custody Category

July 25, 2010

Kelsey Grammer Faces Divorce with No Prenuptial Agreement

It may have seemed like a good idea at the time, but Kelsey Grammer is probably wishing he had sought a prenuptial agreement with wife Camille Donatucci, who he married in 1997. The 41-year-old former Playboy model filed for divorce on July 1, citing irreconcilable differences.

Camille had just been cast as a member of Real Housewives of Beverly Hills, and it was known that Grammer was opposed to her participation on the show, which likely would have dragged him into the spotlight as well. It is not known how much of a role that disagreement played in her divorce filing, or if it played a role at all.

Of great concern to Kelsey Grammer, and surely his wife, is the fact that the couple did not sign a prenup before they married. Needless to say, Grammer may be handing out quite a bit of money before all is said and done.

He is especially concerned about money made during Frasier's 11-year-run, at the end of which Grammer commanded well above $1 million per episode. However, since Kelsey and Camille were married during the last seven years of the show, a lot of that money could be going to Camille under community property laws.

Camille has also asked for joint legal custody of the couple's two children, aged nine and six. It's a request echoed by Grammer, though he has also asked for joint physical custody.

As for rumors and accusations, they're already flying. TMZ reported that Grammer did not call his children on Father's Day, which the actor has flat-out denied. With things just heating up, and both child custody and Grammer's fortune at stake, this may only be the beginning.

Continue reading "Kelsey Grammer Faces Divorce with No Prenuptial Agreement" »

July 24, 2010

Family Law Myths Exposed

Anyone who's had a matter in the Probate and Family Court in Sacramento knows that you spend a lot of time waiting around the courthouse to be heard. Being a Divorce Attorney, I often find myself sitting in the hallways of the courthouse waiting. In these hours of waiting, I often hear unrepresented parties discussing their legal matters and I've come to realize that there are a lot of misconceptions when it comes to what the law actually is. I've decided it's time to address these myths, and bring some clarity.

Myth: Having Joint Legal Custody means that each parent is financially responsible for half of everything the child needs.


Truth: Whether or not a parent has legal custody of a child has nothing to do with whether or not he or she has to pay support, or how much that parent will have to pay. Legal custody dictates who gets to make major decisions for your child, like where your child will attend school. Child Support is based on the gross incomes of both parents, and who has physical custody of the child. Support is paid because both parents have a responsibility to contribute to their child's financial well-being, but the court isn't going to order a parent to pay half if he or she can't afford that.

Further, both parents may not be responsible for all of a child's expenses. Child Support is about covering the necessities in a lump sum. Things like food, clothing, rent or mortgage payments. There are plenty of things that aren't considered necessary expenses, or that are covered by orders separate from a Child Support order. There may be separate provisions for healthcare expenses, or extracurricular activities. Often times, when it comes to discretionary spending that the parents don't agree on (for instance, one parent feels it appropriate to buy the child a brand new car and the other parent doesn't agree), the parent who disagrees may not be responsible for any portion of the purchase.

Myth: Whether or not a parent pays Child Support determines whether or not he or she has a right to see his or her child.


Truth: The obligation to support your child and the right to spend time with your child are totally separate issues. A parent who puts his or her child at risk may be required to pay support, even though he or she is not allowed to see the child. Likewise, a parent who cannot pay support may have an order allowing him or her frequent visits. In the Probate and Family Courts, judges are looking at what is in the best interest of the child. Most of the time, this is the child having both of his or her parents in his or her life, making financial contributions at a level they can afford.

Continue reading "Family Law Myths Exposed" »

June 30, 2010

Former NFL star Corey Dillon charged in drunk driving case

The Los Angeles County district attorney's office announced Monday that it has charged former Cincinnati Bengals running back Corey Dillon with two misdemeanors in connection with his arrest in April on suspicion of drunk-driving.

Dillon, who played 10 seasons for the Cincinnati Bengals and New England Patriots before retiring in 2006, was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs and driving while having a blood-alcohol level of .08% or more.

Dillon was driving north on Mulholland Drive near Malibu on April 21 when deputies with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department pulled him over to check the car's registration. Dillon was arrested after deputies said he displayed signs of intoxication and admitted to drinking earlier in the evening.

While awaiting charges in the drunk driving case, Dillon was arrested on suspicion of domestic violence but prosecutors declined to file criminal charges against the former NFL star, saying there was insufficient evidence to show that his wife, Desiree Antoine-Dillon, was injured at the couple's Calabasas home, officials said Thursday.

Dillon and his wife were arguing over their pending divorce and child custody when she called 911, saying she had been assaulted by her husband, according to a spokeswoman for the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department.

Antoine-Dillon alleged that Dillon "poured milk over her head, threw water on her and poured soy sauce on her" during the dispute, according to the filing rejection released Thursday. She also told authorities she suffered "a superficial cut on her thumb."
She later told authorities that her husband never hit her and her injury was not caused by physical contact with Dillon. Antoine-Dillon also indicated that she did not want to press charges.

Continue reading "Former NFL star Corey Dillon charged in drunk driving case" »

May 29, 2010

Corey Dillon Arrested For Alleged Assault On Wife

CALABASAS, Calif. -- Former NFL running back Corey Dillon has been arrested on suspicion of assaulting his wife during an argument at their Southern California home.

The Los Angeles County sheriff's office says deputies went to Dillon's Calabasas home Saturday after his wife, Desiree Antoine-Dillon, called 911.

The sheriff's office says the couple argued over a pending divorce and child custody issues and she had minor injuries. He was booked and released on $50,000 bail.

Corey Dillon had no public telephone listing in Calabasas and couldn't be reached for comment Monday.

Continue reading "Corey Dillon Arrested For Alleged Assault On Wife" »

May 19, 2010

Nodine to pay alimony, child support

MOBILE, Alabama (WALA) - On the same day Steve Nodine was arrested for drug charges, he and his wife filed for divorce. Those papers reveal the proposed divorce settlement between Kimberlee and Nodine.

Kimberlee Nodine will maintain custody of their 13-year-old son. Steve Nodine has visitation rights and will pay $971 a month in child support payments until his son turns 19.

The papers show that Kimberlee will live in the family home, but Steve will pay the mortgage, insurance and taxes.

The county commissioner will also pay $2,500 a month in alimony payments.

It's a hefty chunk out of his salary. The papers show Steve earns $6,666.66 a month.

But it doesn't end there. Commissioner Nodine agreed to pay for his wife's legal expenses during the divorce, and he'll hand over his retirement pay to her.

In separate papers filed that day, Kimberlee Nodine had a statement which read, "I feel too much has happened between us for things to ever be good again."

The agreement, which both signed, must still be approved by a judge.

Continue reading "Nodine to pay alimony, child support" »

May 10, 2010

California Divorce Overview - Basics About Divorce Laws

California Divorce Overview

California is a 'no-fault' divorce state, which means that when a spouse requests a divorce, they will not need to specify a reason or prove wrong-doing on part of the other. From time of initial filing, the soonest a divorce can be finalized is 6 months.

No-fault does not mean no disagreements, though. If you foresee that there may be disagreements regarding how the family assets are going to be handled, or how the kids will be cared for, get professional advice immediately.

Even if you both agree on how to separate your lives, it is important to have the agreement reviewed by a professional. An advisor who has been involved in many divorces can help you spot weaknesses in the agreement and will help ensure that the final agreement is strong and will last for many, many years.

Continue reading "California Divorce Overview - Basics About Divorce Laws" »

April 25, 2010

Move Away Cases in California

Parents move from time to time and sometimes the move occurs after separation or divorce and sometimes the move is to a distant city or a different state. When one parent wants to move away, custody becomes at issue because it often means that the other parent will see the child less, and maybe much less. In California, where the parents have joint custody, the moving parent must petition the court for a move away order. As part of the process, the parents will be ordered to mediation for the mediator to try to work out a solution that the parties can agree to.

If the parties do not agree, the case then moves to a trial so that the judge can make the best possible informed decision. Judges are bound by Family Law Codes as to the criteria for allowing a parent to move away with the children. The criteria is what is in the best interest of the children and the judges will consider many factors, including the involvement of the parents in the child's life, the history of the parents and the reason for the move. The court will not grant a move where one parent is simply trying to deny the other parent of seeing the child. Move away cases are important and it is best to have an experienced attorney assist you with the process.

Continue reading "Move Away Cases in California" »

April 24, 2010

Sacramento Dependency Court Private Attorney

When parents are accused of child neglect or child endangerment, often Children's Protective Services (CPS) in California will intervene with the family and remove the children to either a foster home or another family members home. This removal is then followed up in just one or two days with the parents being summoned to court, specifically, to Dependency Court.

The first hearing is considered a detention hearing, where CPS will make a case for the children to become temporary wards of the court and to continue to be detained in foster or other care. There is usually a time period where a social worker will meet with the parents and draft a reunification plan that the parents must follow in order to gain return of their children. Often the plan includes treatment for substance abuse or domestic violence intervention.

At the start of this process, parents without funds can choose to be represented by a court appointed attorney. The court appointed attorneys are hard workers and are very busy and often do not have the time to meet with clients for more than just a few minutes or the time to prepare for a complicated trial. This in only one reason why a parent should consider hiring a private attorney to help them in a dependency court matter, and there are others.

Continue reading "Sacramento Dependency Court Private Attorney" »

April 23, 2010

Just When You Think the Custody Fight is Over

In California, child custody between parents is considered a joint effort and commitment based upon the parentage of the child. When parents split up or divorce, sometimes the issue of custody of the child(ren) becomes a fight. Occasionally, the fight becomes very bitter and the issue of custody and parenting time becomes a highly litigated fight. The toll of litigation is great, both in terms of emotional and financial drain to the parents and this strain sometimes spills over to a child. Despite the costs, parents often feel that they must fight to provide a safe home where children can thrive and they believe that their home is better then the other parents.

The fight for custody begins with the filing of an order to show cause to the court, where the instigating parent articulates what custody or parenting time they want. The filing is then followed up by mediation and a court hearing where the Judge will typically grant the report of the mediator. If the parties are not in agreement with the mediation, either party can take the issue to trial for a custody fight before the judge. After mediation, a hearing and a trial, one would believe that the issue of custody is then over, not true. After six months, or in emergency situations, either party can petition the court, citing a change in circumstances, and request a change in custody. This will lead to yet another hearing and mediation.

Some families have been through mediation several times trying to work out custody disputes, and the fight sometimes continues. In highly disputed cases, the court will often order parenting classes, anger management classes and counseling for various family members. These issues can become very complicated and it is recommended to retain an experienced custody dispute attorney.

Continue reading "Just When You Think the Custody Fight is Over" »

April 22, 2010

Stockton Divorce Lawyer, San Joaquin County - Child Custody Tips

If you reside in San Joaquin County, California, and there is a family law matter such as divorce, custody or support, you will be directed to the Family Law Court in Stockton. Each county has their own separate court rules, and San Joaquin County is no exception. Unlike Sacramento County, when a pleading is filed for custody or visitation, the mediation most often takes place on the same date as the hearing date. Mediation is critically important in any family law case where child custody is at issue. The reason that mediation is critical is because the Judge almost orders exactly what the mediator recommends. If the parties do not like the mediators recommendations, either party can ask the court for a trial which is sometimes called a contested hearing or long cause hearing. At the long cause hearing, the parties are able to put on witnesses and exhibits to prove their case if they want. Sometimes the Court will recommend an extended more in depth mediation with a private mediator, which the parties will have to arrange.

As you can see, the tip to success in custody and visitation begins with the appointment with the mediator. In Stockton, the parties are sent to view a video on custody and then they meet with the mediator. It is important to put your best case forward to the mediator, because the mediator will establish the foundation for each parents time with the child(ren). As a lawyer, practicing in the San Joaquin County, Stockton Family Court, I recommend that you have experienced legal representation in the custody process. I am available to meet and discuss how I can personally assist you with this daunting process.

Continue reading "Stockton Divorce Lawyer, San Joaquin County - Child Custody Tips" »

April 15, 2010

Cost-Effective Methods for Dividing Items of Personal Property

In most dissolution cases, a host of assets and liabilities must be accounted for and divided. Homes, cars, boats, snowmobiles, retirement plans, business interests and other "big ticket" items are usually placed on a balance sheet and allocated among the parties, with the spouse receiving more value paying the other a cash equalizer. But what about "the stuff" in your home?

Truth be told, the Court wants nothing to do with dividing items of personal property of nominal value. If parties can't agree on how to divide "the stuff" the judge will simply order everything auctioned and divide the sale proceeds. As you might expect, at auction you'll receive perhaps ten cents on the dollar. We're talking garage sale prices. Then, you, and your spouse, will have to turn right around and purchase another iron, toaster, DVD player and living room set. Makes little sense.

The good news is that there are tried and true processes that we have utilized in assisting couples through the division of "stuff." Here's what has worked for our clients:


  • Two Lists: One of you makes two lists of items, of roughly equal value. The lists are presented to the other. The person who didn't draft the lists gets to pick which list they want. There is an incentive for the person drafting to fairly and equitably divide things or they'll get burned during the selection process.

  • Silent Auction: This is my favorite. A master list of all of your personal property is created. Each party blindly puts a dollar value next to each item. The high bid takes the item at the value listed. Once all items are bid on, the totals for each party are added up. The party receiving the higher dollar value pays the other a cash equalizer to make up the other's shortfall. Parties are free to place a high value on items they really want, but won't list a ridiculous bid out of fear of paying a large offset.

  • Arbitration: An arbitrator is basically a private judge. You pay this person, usually a lawyer, to listen to your side of things in an informal conference setting. Then, your spouse does the same. The arbitrator is given the authority to divide the entire list of items as they deem fair and equitable. Costs are saved because the parties attend the arbitration without counsel and divide the arbitrator's fee. Most couples submit to binding arbitration so that the decision of the arbitrator is final.

  • Rotating Lists: Make a master list and take turns going back and fourth until all of the personal property is divided. Flip a coin to see who goes first.


The bottom line is that usually the personal property of the parties isn't worth the money that will be spent fighting over it. It's true... we've been caught in the middle of disputes over Christmas ornaments, but not by choice. By the time all was said and done, both parties could have purchased a collection of new decor with the legal fees they would have saved by putting down the swords and agreeing to a process that would fairly, and cost-effectively, get the issue of personal property division resolved.

Continue reading "Cost-Effective Methods for Dividing Items of Personal Property" »

April 14, 2010

Jon Gosselin sues Kate for custody of 8 children

READING, Pa. -- Jon Gosselin has sued ex-wife Kate for primary custody of their eight children.

The former reality TV star also asked the Berks County Court on Wednesday to review his child support obligation.

Gosselin's attorney, Anthony List, has previously accused Kate Gosselin of neglecting the children because she appears on ABC's "Dancing with the Stars," a charge her attorney rejected as "patently false."

In court papers, Jon Gosselin says his ex-wife "abuses" her authority when it comes to scheduling visits with the kids. He also claims an arbitrator failed to require Kate to provide documentation of the children's expenses.

Continue reading "Jon Gosselin sues Kate for custody of 8 children" »

April 12, 2010

Woodland Divorce Lawyer, Yolo County - Child Custody Tips

If you reside in Yolo County, California, and there is a family law matter such as divorce, custody or support, you will be directed to the Family Law Court in Woodland. Each county has their own separate court rules, and Yolo County is no exception. Unlike Sacramento County, when a pleading is filed for custody or visitation, the mediation most often takes place on the same date as the hearing date. Mediation is critically important in any family law case where child custody is at issue. The reason that mediation is critical is because the Judge almost orders exactly what the mediator recommends. If the parties do not like the mediators recommendations, either party can ask the court for a trial which is sometimes called a contested hearing or long cause hearing. At the long cause hearing, the parties are able to put on witnesses and exhibits to prove their case if they want. Sometimes the Court will recommend an extended more in depth mediation with a private mediator, which the parties will have to arrange.

As you can see, the tip to success in custody and visitation begins with the appointment with the mediator. In Woodland, the parties are sent to view a video on custody and then they meet with the mediator. It is important to put your best case forward to the mediator, because the mediator will establish the foundation for each parents time with the child(ren). As a lawyer, practicing in the Yolo County, Woodland Family Court, I recommend that you have experienced legal representation in the custody process. I am available to meet and discuss how I can personally assist you with this daunting process.

Continue reading "Woodland Divorce Lawyer, Yolo County - Child Custody Tips" »

April 12, 2010

When Text Messages Bite Back - In Court

Divorce attorney Heather Hostetter says a single text message sent in a fit of rage can wreak havoc in a child custody case. "We've seen e-mails used in court, and now we're beginning to see text messages," she says. "If taken out of context, a text message can make someone look like a real jerk."

Texting is a serious problem because of its flippant nature, says Hostetter, an attorney with the Maryland-based law firm Sachitano Strent and Hostetter. She's been able to convince her clients to let her preview e-mails before they're sent to ex-spouses but not text messages.

Too easily, rapid-fire thumbs type and send sensitive text messages much like ignorant words spout from mindless chatter. Unlike words, though, text messages are stored on servers and phones. These text messages can come back to bite you--hard. A salacious or hurtful text message can lead to a lifetime of embarrassment and even land you in legal hot water.

Enter TigerText, an iPhone app that promises to safeguard you from wayward text messages. The free app lets users send text messages to TigerText's server, which forwards it to a recipient who can view the messages via an app reader. This bypasses a wireless carrier's text messaging service.

Here's the kicker: The text message would then be wiped from the face of the earth. After a pre-determined amount of time, the text message disappears from both the sender's and recipient's phones, as well as TigerText's server.

The purpose of this app, of course, is to hide your tiger tracks. Although TigerText appeared on the App Store late last month, makers of the app swear they came up with the app's name well before steamy Tiger Woods text and voicemail messages to mistresses made headline news.

Whoa, Let's "TTT" (Take it to TigerText)


Hostetter sees a lot of value in TigerText. "I'm considering advising clients to use TigerText if they're having an affair or if they can't exercise impulse control in the heat of anger when corresponding with their soon-to-be ex-spouse," she says.

TigerText has gotten a bad rap because of its apparent association with the Tiger Woods scandal, says TigerText founder Jeffrey Evans . Yet cheating spouses aren't the target users, he says. On the contrary, Evans claims an investment bank uses TigerText so that members of its negotiating team can talk with each other during meetings without worrying about strategic messages getting dug up later.

"Even young professionals in New York will write in an email 'TTT'--or take it to TigerText--if the information is getting sensitive," Evans says.

Allen Edmond, CFO at Flav, a startup flavored water vendor, began using TigerText in order to communicate with Flav's corporate lawyer. Prior to TigerText, Edmond says, the lawyer refused to correspond via text messages, out of fear they might be subpoenaed from the wireless carrier.

(Interestingly, Hostetter doesn't use TigerText when she corresponds with clients because she wants a record of the advice she's given them. Also, she isn't worried about subpoenas because she and her client are protected by attorney-client privilege.)

Now Edmond uses TigerText several times a day. Professionally, he sends text messages to the lawyer and a business partner. He also uses TigerText to joke around with close friends. "We're much more free in talking," Edmond says.

Danger! Danger! Danger!


But that's exactly what Hostetter is afraid of happening. "The danger of TigerText is that it leads people to have the false impression that they don't have to use discretion," she says. "But there's always going to be ways people get around it."

One way is to take a screen shot of the TigerText message. By pressing the home button and the on/off button together on the iPhone, a screenshot is added to your camera roll. Of course, this means the recipient of the text message is intentionally saving it.

Evans says TigerText messages can't be copied or forwarded. As for the iPhone's screenshot feature, he says, "In a version that will come out later this year, we've solved the issue of people being able to screenshot your message." Evans declined to provide details.

Other TigerText features in the offing include the ability to send pictures and voice messages, as well as a possible move to a monthly or annual subscription model.

With pictures, Evans says TigerText can help protect teenagers from making a mistake that will haunt them the rest of their lives. He cites a recent case of middle school students "sexting" a nude photo of an adolescent girl in Belmont, Mass. Now police are looking into possible child pornography charges.

A Loaded Legal Gun?


But this sort of thing--text messages and the law--can put TigerText in a precarious position, says Hostetter.

If police are investigating someone, says Hostetter, then they can notify TigerText to save all texts associated with this individual, possibly without notifying the person. Never mind that the TigerText customer assumes TigerText is deleting all messages.

"I can definitely see myself sending something to TigerText, saying, 'I'm putting you on notice: Don't start deleting texts coming from this phone number,'" Hostetter says. Given the rise of electronic discovery in courts, she says, TigerText could also be subpoenaed to deliver past text messages, its servers scrubbed by a computer forensics expert.

"We would always co-operate with any law enforcement order that's given to the company," Evans says. "We're not going to fly in the face of a judge."

The Sacramento Child Custody Attorneys of Bowman & Associates help clients across Northern California. If you or someone you know has legal questions, contact our experienced Sacramento Family Law Firm for your free initial consultation.

[source]

April 10, 2010

Anatomy of a Breakup

When California became the first state in the nation to legally adopt "no-fault" divorce in 1969, it accomplished by legislative fiat what no unhappy couple ever had -- making divorce completely blameless.

Few of life's contractual arrangements seem better suited to the assignment of fault than divorce -- the dissolution of a legal contract to which both parties pledged to remain faithful unto death. About that: As the divorce rate in the United States soared past 50 percent in the 1970s, it created the largest generation of children in human history who watched their parents' marriages hiss, smoke and finally detonate.

"Nobody really wants to get divorced," says San Jose divorce coach Lana Foladare, whose service -- Divorce Without Drama -- seeks to reduce the pettiness, rage and treachery inherent in the process to merely operatic levels. "There's still some stigma. Every person who goes through it has to reconcile themselves to feeling like, 'I'm a failure because my marriage ended.' "

And yet divorce is not all bad. Many are preferable to the dysfunctional marriages they replace. A divorce decree can mark the beginning of a season of renewal, a chance to start fresh -- eyes wide open to every possibility and pitfall. According to the Web site DivorceWizards.com, 80 percent of men and 75 percent of women remarry within three years.

But no-fault divorce? Tell that to Leslee and David Lageschulte, whose 13-year marriage, and painful yearlong divorce, are the subject of this ninth installment of the Mercury News' 12-part series "Life in a Year."

Not an obvious match

"She was a nice person who seemed pretty confident in herself," says David, who met Leslee in a singles group at their Los Altos church. "I was kind of nervous, and hadn't had much experience with women."

Friends first, they began to fill up the hollow places in each other's lives, then turned into a couple. Leslee was "desperate to have children," David says. "I was desperate for love, desperate to be accepted."

During their two-year courtship, Leslee insisted on premarital counseling because of a previous five-year marriage that ended in divorce. "I wanted to make sure it was going to last," she says. They had never gone all the way sexually. "I think both of us had Christian beliefs that it was the right thing to do," David says.

Despite their caution, they seemed to arrive at the decision to get married from a very different set of needs. Leslee wanted companionship and a family; Lageschulte says he liked the attention and affection he was getting for the first time in his life from a woman. "Being looked upon with such respect was new to me," he says. "It was something I didn't want to lose."

But he also felt pressured to make a decision about marriage. "She's a very strong personality," he says. "I felt controlled in many ways." He proposed on her 30th birthday, after a limousine whisked them to a romantic dinner. "It just seemed like a good thing to do."

The autopsy of any failed marriage inevitably produces conflicting narratives. The first to leave often demonizes the other person -- sometimes retroactively to the beginning of the relationship -- to justify the outcome. People who feel abandoned tend to romanticize the marriage, beating themselves up over what they could have done to hold it together.

In some of the conventional ways that people pick partners -- from life experiences to similar educational backgrounds -- Leslee and David were not an obvious match. Leslee has a master's degree in economics and is an accountant at a venture capital firm. David went to work for the Valley Transportation Authority after high school, and during 25 years there worked his way up from bus driver to a supervisory position.

Husband or baby-maker?


David was unsure he would make a good father and was in no rush to find out. But for Leslee, that was nonnegotiable.

"I had dated someone for a couple of years who I really cared for," she says, but his inability to provide her with children led to a breakup. "David knew going into the marriage that this was very important."

Then they found out that Leslee had fertility problems of her own, and they began going to a clinic for treatment. "Obviously, I wasn't a virgin when I got married, but David was," she says. "I think he was threatened by my experience. During infertility treatments, we had to have sex at certain times, and that was very hard on him."

David already suspected that the success of their marriage had little to do with how much they loved each other. "I feel she was desperate to have children, and she overlooked some things in order to get that," he says. "A part of me feels used, like I was just a baby-maker."

Their first daughter, Hannah, was born seven weeks prematurely, but the experience brought Leslee and David closer, so they quickly tried again. After undergoing more fertility treatments, she conceived, but then suffered a miscarriage. The more depressed she became, the more they argued. She says David finally asked her pointedly, "Why don't you just get over it?"

Leslee went back to work soon after Hannah was born, but she was upset when David accepted a new shift that required him to be gone at night.

"I started enjoying that because it meant I didn't have to be with this angry, unpredictable person," he says.

But for Leslee, being married to a man she rarely saw was no marriage at all. "To me, it's a partnership," she says, "and love is companionship. It's the intimacy that comes from talking and sharing. We had that until his shift changed."

Another woman


An even deeper fissure in their marriage was caused by David's close friendship with another woman. Leslee refers to this as "the affair," but he insists there was no sex and resists the word "affair." Either way, it unleashed a devastating emotional earthquake.

"I had never thought he would ever cheat on me," Leslee says. "To be frank, I don't know if he even had sex with her. But the point was that he had some sort of emotional involvement with this woman."

She says he boasted of the relationship to her, but he says he saw no reason to keep it a secret because it was innocent. Leslee demanded he never see the woman again. David agreed. "I said OK to her face," he recalls, "but in my heart there was a rebel that said, 'You're not going to tell me what to do.' "

That friendship started a year after the arrival of the couple's second child, Elianna, now 6. David agreed to re-enter counseling with a therapist who posed such provocative questions as "When are you going to let yourself be loved?" David says.

"I felt trapped, paralyzed," he says. "I was so scared. I couldn't talk to Leslee about moving out. The counselor's advice was to go ahead and take action, then tell Leslee about it. She said, 'You can't negotiate with Leslee. You don't have the strength to do it.' "

There is no easy way to end a marriage. You move too fast, or move too slow -- there is no velocity at which the human heart will not shatter.

David Lageschulte secretly rented an apartment, then moved out on June 20, 2008. When they explained the move to their two children, David began by saying, "Your mom and I have decided "... " Leslee stopped him cold. "There's no 'we' in this decision," she said. "You have decided."

"I felt betrayed," Leslee says. "In retrospect, I probably should have kicked him out. But I had a 1-year-old and a 5 1/2-year-old. I would have sucked it up and stayed together until my girls were 18. I think children do better with two parents."

Continue reading "Anatomy of a Breakup" »